Not all early stage capital is created equal. Especially in cybersecurity, where GTM cycles are long, trust is hard to earn, and technical depth matters more than shiny pitch decks.
So when you’re raising your first real round, the question isn’t just “Who will fund us?” It’s “Whose model actually fits how security companies grow?”
Let’s break down the difference between micro VCs and seed funds and why one might be better depending on what you’re building.
Micro VC: Fewer Checks, More Involvement
Micro VCs typically manage smaller funds ($10M to $50M) and write $250K to $1M checks. They often lead rounds that are too small or too risky for institutional seed funds.
Pros:
– Faster decisions, looser guardrails
– Often operator led, with direct domain experience
– Will roll up sleeves for GTM, hiring, product market fit
– Don’t need a 100x outcome to be happy with your win
Cons:
– May not have dry powder to follow on
– Tend to favour founders who already know the space
– Can be overly hands on or opinionated without structured support
In cybersecurity, a strong micro VC who’s built or backed security before can be a cheat code. They get the buyer. They know the playbooks. They’ve seen the mess.
Seed Funds: Structure, Brand, and Long-Game Money
Institutional seed funds deploy from $50M+ pools, write larger checks ($1.5M to $3M), and often reserve capital for follow-ons.
Pros:
– More credibility with future rounds
– Access to partner networks, PR, events
– Structured support on hiring, sales, pricing
– Can lead, syndicate, and scale your raise
Cons:
– More process, longer cycles
– Bigger fund = bigger expectations
– Less likely to back raw ideas without traction
– Sometimes generic B2B advice that misses security nuance
If you’re building in a hot category (cloud detection, AI driven remediation, zero trust infrastructure) and already have logos or traction, a seed fund can help you look like a Series A company earlier.
The Cybersecurity Angle
Security buyers are conservative. Sales cycles are slower. Product velocity looks different. That makes micro VCs with domain conviction especially useful, if they can open doors.
But cybersecurity founders also need patience and scale. And seed funds with portfolio overlap (i.e., security-adjacent SaaS) can help you grow up fast, if you’re ready for their expectations.
What to Ask Either Type
– Have you backed a security company before? What happened?
– What’s your follow on policy if we raise again in 12 months?
– Who in your network could be a design partner or buyer?
– How do you help with hiring for deep tech roles?
– What does a “win” look like for your fund size?
Don’t just pick the biggest logo or fastest yes. Pick the capital that understands your category, your pace, and your constraints.
Cybersecurity isn’t just another SaaS vertical. And the wrong funding fit doesn’t just cost equity, it can cost momentum.
Choose the partner, not just the cheque.
Leave a Reply